TSTP Solution File: ITP209^1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : ITP209^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jyTOAs8Zkh true
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:22:55 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.97s 0.81s
% Output : Refutation 0.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 12 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 26 ( 16 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 129 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 117 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 2 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 4 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% ( 9 !!; 0 ??; 0 @@+; 0 @@-)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 9 ^; 22 !; 0 ?; 31 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(a_type,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(c_type,type,
c: a ).
thf(a2_type,type,
a2: a ).
thf(f_type,type,
f: a > a > a ).
thf(b_type,type,
b: a ).
thf(conj_0,conjecture,
( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
= ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
!= ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[conj_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl10,plain,
( ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ b ) @ c )
!= ( f @ ( f @ a2 @ c ) @ b ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(fact_3_right__assoc,axiom,
! [A: a,B: a,C: a] :
( ( f @ ( f @ A @ B ) @ C )
= ( f @ A @ ( f @ B @ C ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: a] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y1: a] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y2: a] :
( ( f @ ( f @ Y0 @ Y1 ) @ Y2 )
= ( f @ Y0 @ ( f @ Y1 @ Y2 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_3_right__assoc]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl23,plain,
! [X2: a] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: a] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y1: a] :
( ( f @ ( f @ X2 @ Y0 ) @ Y1 )
= ( f @ X2 @ ( f @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl24,plain,
! [X2: a,X4: a] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( f @ ( f @ X2 @ X4 ) @ Y0 )
= ( f @ X2 @ ( f @ X4 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl23]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl25,plain,
! [X2: a,X4: a,X6: a] :
( ( f @ ( f @ X2 @ X4 ) @ X6 )
= ( f @ X2 @ ( f @ X4 @ X6 ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl24]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl26,plain,
! [X2: a,X4: a,X6: a] :
( ( f @ ( f @ X2 @ X4 ) @ X6 )
= ( f @ X2 @ ( f @ X4 @ X6 ) ) ),
inference('simplify nested equalities',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl25]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl26_001,plain,
! [X2: a,X4: a,X6: a] :
( ( f @ ( f @ X2 @ X4 ) @ X6 )
= ( f @ X2 @ ( f @ X4 @ X6 ) ) ),
inference('simplify nested equalities',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl25]) ).
thf(fact_1_commute,axiom,
! [A: a,B: a] :
( ( f @ A @ B )
= ( f @ B @ A ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: a] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y1: a] :
( ( f @ Y0 @ Y1 )
= ( f @ Y1 @ Y0 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_1_commute]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl11,plain,
! [X2: a] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: a] :
( ( f @ X2 @ Y0 )
= ( f @ Y0 @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl12,plain,
! [X2: a,X4: a] :
( ( f @ X2 @ X4 )
= ( f @ X4 @ X2 ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl11]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl13,plain,
! [X2: a,X4: a] :
( ( f @ X2 @ X4 )
= ( f @ X4 @ X2 ) ),
inference('simplify nested equalities',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl12]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl27,plain,
( ( f @ a2 @ ( f @ b @ c ) )
!= ( f @ a2 @ ( f @ b @ c ) ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl10,zip_derived_cl26,zip_derived_cl26,zip_derived_cl13]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl28,plain,
$false,
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl27]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : ITP209^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.jyTOAs8Zkh true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 11:56:34 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in HO mode
% 0.22/0.67 % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.22/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.22/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.22/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.22/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.97/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.97/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.97/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.97/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 0.97/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.97/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 0.97/0.81 % Solved by lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh.
% 0.97/0.81 % done 0 iterations in 0.011s
% 0.97/0.81 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.97/0.81 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.97/0.81
% 0.97/0.81
% 0.97/0.81 % Terminating...
% 1.66/0.88 % Runner terminated.
% 1.66/0.89 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------